You join a new project (and if you’re a consultant like me then this happens a lot) and you start asking a bunch of questions. Where’s the svn repository? What version of Rails are we using? How do I install this other thing upon which our thing depends? And the answers come. But then it’s a few days later and the more sensitive questions come: Why aren’t we pairing much? Why is this meeting scheduled to take most of the day (when it should 45 minutes at most)? How come the dev boxes are so slow? And if the answers you get to those questions are variations on “Um… We can’t do that – talk to me about it later.” then something is busted.

You don’t know what it is, but you can feel it in the atmosphere. It’s tense. Some things are unspoken and mysterious forces are making sure it stays that way. Every iteration seems like it has too much in it. Its common knowledge that we have way more scheduled for release 1.0 then we can do in the time allowed.

If this is how XP feels then you’re doing it wrong. The point of an iteration isn’t to make every week a death march, it’s to increase visibility. If you didn’t get your 20 points of work done this week, the solution is not to mandate overtime or give speeches about how we “really need to get more done this week” and you certainly don’t want to just sign up for another 20 points for next week (only to fail again). If 2/5s of you team was out last week or lightning struck the servers then you can call it a bad week and move on. What bugs me is when people get pulled out for normal things (meetings, other projects they are assigned to, or normal fire dousing) and then the “bad iteration” gets blamed on “circumstance beyond our control” and we sign up for the same amount of work. There will, believe it or not, be more meetings in the future. So just call it overhead and adjust the amount of work we can accomplish in a week. And if that means we won’t hit our release date, then its good we know now. Right? If its not good we know now, then we’ve got a whole other set of problems.